Strategic Alignment Maturity

Question: Discuss about theStrategic Alignment Maturity. Answer: Introduction: In this study, the demonstration of the path of using the strategic alignment maturity for the enhancement of the organizations capability is present. The strategic alignment maturity is an assessment that is utilized as a structure for demonstrating the evolution of IT-business alignment practices for enabling the achievement of the organization objectives (Rosemann Brocke, 2015). Assessing Strategic Alignment Maturity: Various studies, models and articles are available at present regarding the topic, business-IT alignment. It makes hard for the organizations to choose the appropriate model to be utilized for the business. Implementation of the organizations Alignment for One business strategy needs alignment with the information technology strategies (Luftman et al., 2012). Regarding a corporate, for properly aligning its information technology strategies with the business strategies, particular strategic IT choices and management practices must be considered. It is because the these choices and practices assist in facilitating integration. Organizations can implement information technology business alignment activities for understanding the present IT-business alignment. In addition to that, it can be utilized as a crucial information that can serve as a road map for improvements in every section of the organization (Gerow, Thatcher Grover, 2015). The SAM or strategic alignment maturity can be us ed as a questionnaire tool for conducting analysis. A SAM assessment team can be employed who will make use of the result of the questionnaire to coverage on a complete assessment level of the maturity for the organization. The SAM model consists of six distinct alignment areas. Multiple attributes are associated with each area of the model. The areas are communication, scope architecture governance, partnership, value measurement, and skills (Solar, Sabattin, Parada, 2013)., Communication: Regarding establishing mutual understanding among the business and IT functions, the communication approach of the SAM assessment can be used (Luftman et al., 2012). The aspects of the communication are as following. Inter/intra-organizational learning Mutual understanding of the IT and business environments Liaison breadth/effectiveness Knowledge sharing Communication protocol rigidity Value measurement: While determining the contribution and significant of information technology to the organization, the value measurement can be utilized (Solar, Sabattin, Parada, 2013). The various aspects of the value measurement are as following. Pervasiveness and introduction of coordinated measures Frequency and custom of evaluations/surveys Focus of measurements and procedures to quantify IT's commitment Pervasiveness of administration level understandings Pervasiveness of ceaseless change rehearses Frequency and custom of benchmarking practices The quality of the measurement of the performance of the organization and value of the projects determines the quality of this particular process. After the completion of a project, it is crucial for the organization to determine the aspects that affected the project in terms of good or bad (Rosemann Brocke, 2015). Governance: Through the governance, the organization can make choices regarding selection of IT and prioritizing projects (Gerow, Thatcher Grover, 2015). The aspects of the governance are as following. Reporting level of the CIO Inescapability of business vital arranging with IT inclusion IT budgeting IT investment management Recurrence, convention, and viability of directing boards Inescapability of IT vital arranging with business contribution Structure of the IT association Every organization carries out analysis with a pre-determined strategy. The organization has made sure that the projects that are commenced are course from an considerate of the business approach (Roglinger, Poppelbub, Becker, 2012). It is crucial to recognize the significance and association of the projects to the strategy. Partnership: This implies that how good the information and business technology links with each other (Luftman et al., 2012). The aspects of this area are as following. Part of IT in key business arranging Inescapability of trust and esteem Incorporated sharing of dangers and prizes Reporting level of business support/champion Business view of IT esteem Custom and adequacy of organization projects It is crucial to provide the chance to the information technology in defining the business strategies (Luftman, 2015). Scope Architecture: The scope and architecture in strategic alignment maturity are the strategic choices and management decisions that an enterprise makes at the time of allocating resources to IT-infrastructure (Roglinger, Poppelbub, Becker, 2012). The elements of the area are as following. Inescapability of coordinated benchmarks Inescapability of foundation straightforwardness and adaptability Innovative and key modernity of essential frameworks/applications Inescapability of engineering combination Administration of developing innovations Skills: The skills are associated with the choices that are related to human resource management (Gerow, Thatcher Grover, 2015). The entities are as following. Inescapability of progress status culture Contracting and maintenance Custom of administration style Conclusion: From the above study, it can be concluded that business-IT alignment is a very crucial approach for enhancing the capacity of the organization. The SAM or strategic alignment maturity model is a good approach for assessing the business-IT alignment. The six stages of the maturity model assist the organization to conduct the analysis in a proper stage. References: Gerow, J. E., Thatcher, J. B., Grover, V. (2015). Six types of IT-business strategic alignment: an investigation of the constructs and their measurement.European Journal of Information Systems,24(5), 465-491. Luftman, J. (2015). Strategic alignment maturity. InHandbook on Business Process Management 2(pp. 5-43). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Luftman, J. N., Ben-Zvi, T., Dwivedi, R., Rigoni, E. H. (2012). IT Governance: An alignment maturity perspective.Business Strategy and Applications in Enterprise IT Governance, 87-101. Roglinger, M., Poppelbub, J., Becker, J. (2012). Maturity models in business process management.Business Process Management Journal,18(2), 328-346. Rosemann, M., vom Brocke, J. (2015). The six core elements of business process management. InHandbook on Business Process Management 1(pp. 105-122). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Solar, M., Sabattin, J., Parada, V. (2013). A Maturity Model for Assessing the Use of ICT in School Education.Educational Technology Society,16(1), 206-218.